TY - JOUR
T1 - The validity and usability of an eight marker model for avatar-based biofeedback gait training
AU - Booth, A. T. C.
AU - van der Krogt, M. M.
AU - Buizer, A. I.
AU - Steenbrink, F.
AU - Harlaar, J.
PY - 2019/12/1
Y1 - 2019/12/1
N2 - Background: Virtual reality presents a platform for therapeutic gaming, and incorporation of immersive biofeedback on gait may enhance outcomes in rehabilitation. Time is limited in therapeutic practice, therefore any potential gait training tool requires a short set up time, while maintaining clinical relevance and accuracy. The aim of this study was to develop, validate, and establish the usability of an avatar-based application for biofeedback-enhanced gait training with minimal set up time. Methods: A simplified, eight marker model was developed using eight passive markers placed on anatomical landmarks. This allowed for visualisation of avatar-based biofeedback on pelvis kinematics, hip and knee sagittal angles in real-time. Retrospective gait analysis data from typically developing children (n = 41) and children with cerebral palsy (n = 25), were used to validate eight marker model. Gait outcomes were compared to the Human Body Model using statistical parametric mapping. Usability for use in clinical practice was tested in five clinical rehabilitation centers with the system usability score. Findings: Gait outcomes of Human Body Model and eight marker model were comparable, with small differences in gait parameters. The discrepancies between models were <5°, except for knee extension where eight marker model showed significantly less knee extension, especially towards full extension. The application was considered of ‘high marginal acceptability’ (system usability score, mean 68 (SD 13)). Interpretation: Gait biofeedback can be achieved, to acceptable accuracy for within-session gait training, using an eight marker model. The application may be considered usable and implemented for use in patient populations undergoing gait training.
AB - Background: Virtual reality presents a platform for therapeutic gaming, and incorporation of immersive biofeedback on gait may enhance outcomes in rehabilitation. Time is limited in therapeutic practice, therefore any potential gait training tool requires a short set up time, while maintaining clinical relevance and accuracy. The aim of this study was to develop, validate, and establish the usability of an avatar-based application for biofeedback-enhanced gait training with minimal set up time. Methods: A simplified, eight marker model was developed using eight passive markers placed on anatomical landmarks. This allowed for visualisation of avatar-based biofeedback on pelvis kinematics, hip and knee sagittal angles in real-time. Retrospective gait analysis data from typically developing children (n = 41) and children with cerebral palsy (n = 25), were used to validate eight marker model. Gait outcomes were compared to the Human Body Model using statistical parametric mapping. Usability for use in clinical practice was tested in five clinical rehabilitation centers with the system usability score. Findings: Gait outcomes of Human Body Model and eight marker model were comparable, with small differences in gait parameters. The discrepancies between models were <5°, except for knee extension where eight marker model showed significantly less knee extension, especially towards full extension. The application was considered of ‘high marginal acceptability’ (system usability score, mean 68 (SD 13)). Interpretation: Gait biofeedback can be achieved, to acceptable accuracy for within-session gait training, using an eight marker model. The application may be considered usable and implemented for use in patient populations undergoing gait training.
KW - Biofeedback
KW - Cerebral palsy
KW - Rehabilitation
KW - Virtual reality
KW - Walking
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85071766722&origin=inward
UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31499394
U2 - 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.08.013
DO - 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.08.013
M3 - Article
C2 - 31499394
VL - 70
SP - 146
EP - 152
JO - Clinical Biomechanics
JF - Clinical Biomechanics
SN - 0268-0033
ER -