“They Are Talking About Me, but Not with Me”: A Focus Group Study to Explore the Patient Perspective on Interprofessional Team Meetings in Primary Care

Jerôme Jean Jacques van Dongen, Maarten de Wit, Hester Wilhelmina Henrica Smeets, Esther Stoffers, Marloes Amantia van Bokhoven, Ramon Daniëls

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: The number of people with multiple chronic conditions receiving primary care services is growing. To deal with their increasingly complex health care demands, professionals from different disciplines need to collaborate. Interprofessional team (IPT) meetings are becoming more popular. Several studies describe important factors related to conducting IPT meetings, mostly from a professional perspective. However, in the light of patient-centeredness, it is valuable to also explore the patients’ perspective. Objective: The aim was to explore the patients’ perspectives regarding IPT meetings in primary care. Methods: A qualitative study with a focus group design was conducted in the Netherlands. Two focus group meetings took place, for which the same patients were invited. The participants, chronically ill patients with experience on interprofessional collaboration, were recruited through the regional patient association. Participants discussed viewpoints, expectations, and concerns regarding IPT meetings in two rounds, using a focus group protocol and selected video-taped vignettes of team meetings. The first meeting focused on conceptualization and identification of themes related to IPT meetings that are important to patients. The second meeting aimed to gain more in-depth knowledge and understanding of the priorities. Discussions were audio-taped and transcribed verbatim, and analyzed by means of content analysis. Results: The focus group meetings included seven patients. Findings were divided into six key categories, capturing the factors that patients found important regarding IPT meetings: (1) putting the patient at the center, (2) opportunities for patients to participate, (3) appropriate team composition, (4) structured approach, (5) respectful communication, and (6) informing the patient about meeting outcomes. Conclusions: Patients identified different elements regarding IPT meetings that are important from their perspective. They emphasized the right of patients or their representatives to take part in IPT meetings. Results of this study can be used to develop tools and programs to improve interprofessional collaboration.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)429-438
Number of pages10
JournalPatient
Volume10
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2017

Cite this

van Dongen, Jerôme Jean Jacques ; de Wit, Maarten ; Smeets, Hester Wilhelmina Henrica ; Stoffers, Esther ; van Bokhoven, Marloes Amantia ; Daniëls, Ramon. / “They Are Talking About Me, but Not with Me” : A Focus Group Study to Explore the Patient Perspective on Interprofessional Team Meetings in Primary Care. In: Patient. 2017 ; Vol. 10, No. 4. pp. 429-438.
@article{fedff79d43874e20a1505a1db3aaeb53,
title = "“They Are Talking About Me, but Not with Me”: A Focus Group Study to Explore the Patient Perspective on Interprofessional Team Meetings in Primary Care",
abstract = "Background: The number of people with multiple chronic conditions receiving primary care services is growing. To deal with their increasingly complex health care demands, professionals from different disciplines need to collaborate. Interprofessional team (IPT) meetings are becoming more popular. Several studies describe important factors related to conducting IPT meetings, mostly from a professional perspective. However, in the light of patient-centeredness, it is valuable to also explore the patients’ perspective. Objective: The aim was to explore the patients’ perspectives regarding IPT meetings in primary care. Methods: A qualitative study with a focus group design was conducted in the Netherlands. Two focus group meetings took place, for which the same patients were invited. The participants, chronically ill patients with experience on interprofessional collaboration, were recruited through the regional patient association. Participants discussed viewpoints, expectations, and concerns regarding IPT meetings in two rounds, using a focus group protocol and selected video-taped vignettes of team meetings. The first meeting focused on conceptualization and identification of themes related to IPT meetings that are important to patients. The second meeting aimed to gain more in-depth knowledge and understanding of the priorities. Discussions were audio-taped and transcribed verbatim, and analyzed by means of content analysis. Results: The focus group meetings included seven patients. Findings were divided into six key categories, capturing the factors that patients found important regarding IPT meetings: (1) putting the patient at the center, (2) opportunities for patients to participate, (3) appropriate team composition, (4) structured approach, (5) respectful communication, and (6) informing the patient about meeting outcomes. Conclusions: Patients identified different elements regarding IPT meetings that are important from their perspective. They emphasized the right of patients or their representatives to take part in IPT meetings. Results of this study can be used to develop tools and programs to improve interprofessional collaboration.",
author = "{van Dongen}, {Jer{\^o}me Jean Jacques} and {de Wit}, Maarten and Smeets, {Hester Wilhelmina Henrica} and Esther Stoffers and {van Bokhoven}, {Marloes Amantia} and Ramon Dani{\"e}ls",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s40271-017-0214-3",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "429--438",
journal = "Patient-patient centered outcomes research",
issn = "1178-1653",
publisher = "Springer Science + Business Media",
number = "4",

}

“They Are Talking About Me, but Not with Me” : A Focus Group Study to Explore the Patient Perspective on Interprofessional Team Meetings in Primary Care. / van Dongen, Jerôme Jean Jacques; de Wit, Maarten; Smeets, Hester Wilhelmina Henrica; Stoffers, Esther; van Bokhoven, Marloes Amantia; Daniëls, Ramon.

In: Patient, Vol. 10, No. 4, 01.08.2017, p. 429-438.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - “They Are Talking About Me, but Not with Me”

T2 - A Focus Group Study to Explore the Patient Perspective on Interprofessional Team Meetings in Primary Care

AU - van Dongen, Jerôme Jean Jacques

AU - de Wit, Maarten

AU - Smeets, Hester Wilhelmina Henrica

AU - Stoffers, Esther

AU - van Bokhoven, Marloes Amantia

AU - Daniëls, Ramon

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - Background: The number of people with multiple chronic conditions receiving primary care services is growing. To deal with their increasingly complex health care demands, professionals from different disciplines need to collaborate. Interprofessional team (IPT) meetings are becoming more popular. Several studies describe important factors related to conducting IPT meetings, mostly from a professional perspective. However, in the light of patient-centeredness, it is valuable to also explore the patients’ perspective. Objective: The aim was to explore the patients’ perspectives regarding IPT meetings in primary care. Methods: A qualitative study with a focus group design was conducted in the Netherlands. Two focus group meetings took place, for which the same patients were invited. The participants, chronically ill patients with experience on interprofessional collaboration, were recruited through the regional patient association. Participants discussed viewpoints, expectations, and concerns regarding IPT meetings in two rounds, using a focus group protocol and selected video-taped vignettes of team meetings. The first meeting focused on conceptualization and identification of themes related to IPT meetings that are important to patients. The second meeting aimed to gain more in-depth knowledge and understanding of the priorities. Discussions were audio-taped and transcribed verbatim, and analyzed by means of content analysis. Results: The focus group meetings included seven patients. Findings were divided into six key categories, capturing the factors that patients found important regarding IPT meetings: (1) putting the patient at the center, (2) opportunities for patients to participate, (3) appropriate team composition, (4) structured approach, (5) respectful communication, and (6) informing the patient about meeting outcomes. Conclusions: Patients identified different elements regarding IPT meetings that are important from their perspective. They emphasized the right of patients or their representatives to take part in IPT meetings. Results of this study can be used to develop tools and programs to improve interprofessional collaboration.

AB - Background: The number of people with multiple chronic conditions receiving primary care services is growing. To deal with their increasingly complex health care demands, professionals from different disciplines need to collaborate. Interprofessional team (IPT) meetings are becoming more popular. Several studies describe important factors related to conducting IPT meetings, mostly from a professional perspective. However, in the light of patient-centeredness, it is valuable to also explore the patients’ perspective. Objective: The aim was to explore the patients’ perspectives regarding IPT meetings in primary care. Methods: A qualitative study with a focus group design was conducted in the Netherlands. Two focus group meetings took place, for which the same patients were invited. The participants, chronically ill patients with experience on interprofessional collaboration, were recruited through the regional patient association. Participants discussed viewpoints, expectations, and concerns regarding IPT meetings in two rounds, using a focus group protocol and selected video-taped vignettes of team meetings. The first meeting focused on conceptualization and identification of themes related to IPT meetings that are important to patients. The second meeting aimed to gain more in-depth knowledge and understanding of the priorities. Discussions were audio-taped and transcribed verbatim, and analyzed by means of content analysis. Results: The focus group meetings included seven patients. Findings were divided into six key categories, capturing the factors that patients found important regarding IPT meetings: (1) putting the patient at the center, (2) opportunities for patients to participate, (3) appropriate team composition, (4) structured approach, (5) respectful communication, and (6) informing the patient about meeting outcomes. Conclusions: Patients identified different elements regarding IPT meetings that are important from their perspective. They emphasized the right of patients or their representatives to take part in IPT meetings. Results of this study can be used to develop tools and programs to improve interprofessional collaboration.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009902017&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s40271-017-0214-3

DO - 10.1007/s40271-017-0214-3

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 429

EP - 438

JO - Patient-patient centered outcomes research

JF - Patient-patient centered outcomes research

SN - 1178-1653

IS - 4

ER -