Twelve tips for assessing surgical performance and use of technical assessment scales

Jeanett Strandbygaard, Fedde Scheele, Jette Led Sørensen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Using validated assessment scales for technical competence can help structure and standardize assessment and feedback for both the trainee and the supervisor and thereby avoid bias and drive learning. Correct assessment of operative skills can establish learning curves and allow adequate monitoring. However, the assessment of surgical performance is not an easy task, since it includes many proxy parameters, which are hard to measure. Although numerous technical assessment scales exist, both within laparoscopic and open surgery, the validity evidence is often sparse, and this can raise doubts about reliability and educational outcome. Furthermore, the implementation of technical assessment scales varies due to several obstacles and doubts about accurate use. In this 12-tips article, we aim to give the readers a critical and useful appraisal of some of the common questions and misunderstandings regarding the use of surgical assessment scales and provide tips to ease and overcome potential pitfalls.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)32-37
Number of pages6
JournalMedical Teacher
Volume39
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2017

Cite this

Strandbygaard, Jeanett ; Scheele, Fedde ; Sørensen, Jette Led. / Twelve tips for assessing surgical performance and use of technical assessment scales. In: Medical Teacher. 2017 ; Vol. 39, No. 1. pp. 32-37.
@article{ca1eb27b70e0456e87f8e27d2c6538bd,
title = "Twelve tips for assessing surgical performance and use of technical assessment scales",
abstract = "Using validated assessment scales for technical competence can help structure and standardize assessment and feedback for both the trainee and the supervisor and thereby avoid bias and drive learning. Correct assessment of operative skills can establish learning curves and allow adequate monitoring. However, the assessment of surgical performance is not an easy task, since it includes many proxy parameters, which are hard to measure. Although numerous technical assessment scales exist, both within laparoscopic and open surgery, the validity evidence is often sparse, and this can raise doubts about reliability and educational outcome. Furthermore, the implementation of technical assessment scales varies due to several obstacles and doubts about accurate use. In this 12-tips article, we aim to give the readers a critical and useful appraisal of some of the common questions and misunderstandings regarding the use of surgical assessment scales and provide tips to ease and overcome potential pitfalls.",
keywords = "Clinical Competence, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Educational Measurement, Humans, Laparoscopy, Observation, Observer Variation, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results, Surgical Procedures, Operative, Videotape Recording, Journal Article",
author = "Jeanett Strandbygaard and Fedde Scheele and S{\o}rensen, {Jette Led}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1080/0142159X.2016.1231911",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "32--37",
journal = "Medical Teacher",
issn = "0142-159X",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "1",

}

Twelve tips for assessing surgical performance and use of technical assessment scales. / Strandbygaard, Jeanett; Scheele, Fedde; Sørensen, Jette Led.

In: Medical Teacher, Vol. 39, No. 1, 01.2017, p. 32-37.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Twelve tips for assessing surgical performance and use of technical assessment scales

AU - Strandbygaard, Jeanett

AU - Scheele, Fedde

AU - Sørensen, Jette Led

PY - 2017/1

Y1 - 2017/1

N2 - Using validated assessment scales for technical competence can help structure and standardize assessment and feedback for both the trainee and the supervisor and thereby avoid bias and drive learning. Correct assessment of operative skills can establish learning curves and allow adequate monitoring. However, the assessment of surgical performance is not an easy task, since it includes many proxy parameters, which are hard to measure. Although numerous technical assessment scales exist, both within laparoscopic and open surgery, the validity evidence is often sparse, and this can raise doubts about reliability and educational outcome. Furthermore, the implementation of technical assessment scales varies due to several obstacles and doubts about accurate use. In this 12-tips article, we aim to give the readers a critical and useful appraisal of some of the common questions and misunderstandings regarding the use of surgical assessment scales and provide tips to ease and overcome potential pitfalls.

AB - Using validated assessment scales for technical competence can help structure and standardize assessment and feedback for both the trainee and the supervisor and thereby avoid bias and drive learning. Correct assessment of operative skills can establish learning curves and allow adequate monitoring. However, the assessment of surgical performance is not an easy task, since it includes many proxy parameters, which are hard to measure. Although numerous technical assessment scales exist, both within laparoscopic and open surgery, the validity evidence is often sparse, and this can raise doubts about reliability and educational outcome. Furthermore, the implementation of technical assessment scales varies due to several obstacles and doubts about accurate use. In this 12-tips article, we aim to give the readers a critical and useful appraisal of some of the common questions and misunderstandings regarding the use of surgical assessment scales and provide tips to ease and overcome potential pitfalls.

KW - Clinical Competence

KW - Cost-Benefit Analysis

KW - Educational Measurement

KW - Humans

KW - Laparoscopy

KW - Observation

KW - Observer Variation

KW - Psychometrics

KW - Reproducibility of Results

KW - Surgical Procedures, Operative

KW - Videotape Recording

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1080/0142159X.2016.1231911

DO - 10.1080/0142159X.2016.1231911

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 32

EP - 37

JO - Medical Teacher

JF - Medical Teacher

SN - 0142-159X

IS - 1

ER -