Ultrasonographic fetal head position to predict mode of delivery: a systematic review and bivariate meta-analysis

C J M Verhoeven, M E P F Rückert, B C Opmeer, E Pajkrt, B W J Mol

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We performed a systematic review to determine whether sonographic assessment of occipital position of the fetal head can contribute to the prediction of the mode of delivery.

METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search of electronic databases from inception to May 2011. Two reviewers independently extracted data from the included studies. We used a bivariate model to estimate point estimates for sensitivity and specificity curves for the outcome Cesarean delivery. Eligible studies were cohort studies or cross-sectional studies that reported on both the position of the fetal head, as assessed by ultrasound, before or at the beginning of active labor as well as the outcome of labor in women at term.

RESULTS: We included 11 primary articles reporting on 5053 women, of whom 898 had a Cesarean section. All studies indicated disappointing values for sensitivity and specificity in the prediction of Cesarean section. Summary point estimates of sensitivity and specificity were 0.39 (95% CI, 0.32-0.48) and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.67-0.74), respectively.

CONCLUSION: Sonographic assessment of occipital position of the fetal head before delivery should not be used in the prediction of mode of delivery.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)9-13
Number of pages5
JournalUltrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume40
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2012

Cite this

@article{b593042af3db46a5a2bd9e280aff9e3f,
title = "Ultrasonographic fetal head position to predict mode of delivery: a systematic review and bivariate meta-analysis",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: We performed a systematic review to determine whether sonographic assessment of occipital position of the fetal head can contribute to the prediction of the mode of delivery.METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search of electronic databases from inception to May 2011. Two reviewers independently extracted data from the included studies. We used a bivariate model to estimate point estimates for sensitivity and specificity curves for the outcome Cesarean delivery. Eligible studies were cohort studies or cross-sectional studies that reported on both the position of the fetal head, as assessed by ultrasound, before or at the beginning of active labor as well as the outcome of labor in women at term.RESULTS: We included 11 primary articles reporting on 5053 women, of whom 898 had a Cesarean section. All studies indicated disappointing values for sensitivity and specificity in the prediction of Cesarean section. Summary point estimates of sensitivity and specificity were 0.39 (95{\%} CI, 0.32-0.48) and 0.71 (95{\%} CI, 0.67-0.74), respectively.CONCLUSION: Sonographic assessment of occipital position of the fetal head before delivery should not be used in the prediction of mode of delivery.",
keywords = "Cohort Studies, Cross-Sectional Studies, Delivery, Obstetric/methods, Female, Head/diagnostic imaging, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Labor Presentation, Labor, Obstetric, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Ultrasonography, Prenatal/adverse effects",
author = "Verhoeven, {C J M} and R{\"u}ckert, {M E P F} and Opmeer, {B C} and E Pajkrt and Mol, {B W J}",
note = "Copyright {\circledC} 2012 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1002/uog.10102",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "9--13",
journal = "Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0960-7692",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "1",

}

Ultrasonographic fetal head position to predict mode of delivery : a systematic review and bivariate meta-analysis. / Verhoeven, C J M; Rückert, M E P F; Opmeer, B C; Pajkrt, E; Mol, B W J.

In: Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 40, No. 1, 07.2012, p. 9-13.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ultrasonographic fetal head position to predict mode of delivery

T2 - a systematic review and bivariate meta-analysis

AU - Verhoeven, C J M

AU - Rückert, M E P F

AU - Opmeer, B C

AU - Pajkrt, E

AU - Mol, B W J

N1 - Copyright © 2012 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

PY - 2012/7

Y1 - 2012/7

N2 - OBJECTIVE: We performed a systematic review to determine whether sonographic assessment of occipital position of the fetal head can contribute to the prediction of the mode of delivery.METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search of electronic databases from inception to May 2011. Two reviewers independently extracted data from the included studies. We used a bivariate model to estimate point estimates for sensitivity and specificity curves for the outcome Cesarean delivery. Eligible studies were cohort studies or cross-sectional studies that reported on both the position of the fetal head, as assessed by ultrasound, before or at the beginning of active labor as well as the outcome of labor in women at term.RESULTS: We included 11 primary articles reporting on 5053 women, of whom 898 had a Cesarean section. All studies indicated disappointing values for sensitivity and specificity in the prediction of Cesarean section. Summary point estimates of sensitivity and specificity were 0.39 (95% CI, 0.32-0.48) and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.67-0.74), respectively.CONCLUSION: Sonographic assessment of occipital position of the fetal head before delivery should not be used in the prediction of mode of delivery.

AB - OBJECTIVE: We performed a systematic review to determine whether sonographic assessment of occipital position of the fetal head can contribute to the prediction of the mode of delivery.METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search of electronic databases from inception to May 2011. Two reviewers independently extracted data from the included studies. We used a bivariate model to estimate point estimates for sensitivity and specificity curves for the outcome Cesarean delivery. Eligible studies were cohort studies or cross-sectional studies that reported on both the position of the fetal head, as assessed by ultrasound, before or at the beginning of active labor as well as the outcome of labor in women at term.RESULTS: We included 11 primary articles reporting on 5053 women, of whom 898 had a Cesarean section. All studies indicated disappointing values for sensitivity and specificity in the prediction of Cesarean section. Summary point estimates of sensitivity and specificity were 0.39 (95% CI, 0.32-0.48) and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.67-0.74), respectively.CONCLUSION: Sonographic assessment of occipital position of the fetal head before delivery should not be used in the prediction of mode of delivery.

KW - Cohort Studies

KW - Cross-Sectional Studies

KW - Delivery, Obstetric/methods

KW - Female

KW - Head/diagnostic imaging

KW - Humans

KW - Infant, Newborn

KW - Labor Presentation

KW - Labor, Obstetric

KW - Predictive Value of Tests

KW - Pregnancy

KW - Ultrasonography, Prenatal/adverse effects

U2 - 10.1002/uog.10102

DO - 10.1002/uog.10102

M3 - Review article

VL - 40

SP - 9

EP - 13

JO - Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0960-7692

IS - 1

ER -