Use of the READER method of critical appraisal in general practice. Study did not properly answer the questions it posed

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Cite this

@article{95406d557ed54adf920ffcd124c3db86,

title = "Use of the READER method of critical appraisal in general practice. Study did not properly answer the questions it posed",

keywords = "Data Interpretation, Statistical, Family Practice, Peer Review, Research/methods, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Reading",

author = "{van der Wouden}, {J C}",

year = "1998",

month = "9",

day = "19",

language = "English",

volume = "317",

pages = "819",

journal = "British Medical Journal",

issn = "0959-535X",

number = "7161",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of the READER method of critical appraisal in general practice. Study did not properly answer the questions it posed

AU - van der Wouden, J C

PY - 1998/9/19

Y1 - 1998/9/19

KW - Data Interpretation, Statistical

KW - Family Practice

KW - Peer Review, Research/methods

KW - Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

KW - Reading

M3 - Article

C2 - 9786688

VL - 317

SP - 819

JO - British Medical Journal

JF - British Medical Journal

SN - 0959-535X

IS - 7161

ER -