Validation of an implicit instrument to assess God representations. Part 2: Associations between implicit and explicit measures of God representations and object-relational functioning

Henk P. Stulp, Gerrit G. Glas, Liesbeth Eurelings-Bontekoe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Results about associations between God representations and well-being/mental health can be questioned because they are predominantly based on studies with self-report instruments. There are no well-validated implicit measures of God representations. Therefore we developed the Apperception Test for God Representations (ATGR). In a clinical (n = 75) and a nonclinical (n = 71) sample, we found patterns of associations of scales of the ATGR and of an explicit God representation measure with implicit and explicit measures of object-relational functioning that undergirded the validity of most ATGR scales. Differences in patterns of associations between patients and nonpatients could theoretically be explained by the concept mentalization.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Spirituality in Mental Health
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Cite this

@article{3f85db0dcf694e8b83045cac19bf0405,
title = "Validation of an implicit instrument to assess God representations. Part 2: Associations between implicit and explicit measures of God representations and object-relational functioning",
abstract = "Results about associations between God representations and well-being/mental health can be questioned because they are predominantly based on studies with self-report instruments. There are no well-validated implicit measures of God representations. Therefore we developed the Apperception Test for God Representations (ATGR). In a clinical (n = 75) and a nonclinical (n = 71) sample, we found patterns of associations of scales of the ATGR and of an explicit God representation measure with implicit and explicit measures of object-relational functioning that undergirded the validity of most ATGR scales. Differences in patterns of associations between patients and nonpatients could theoretically be explained by the concept mentalization.",
author = "Stulp, {Henk P.} and Glas, {Gerrit G.} and Liesbeth Eurelings-Bontekoe",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/19349637.2019.1569490",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Spirituality in Mental Health",
issn = "1934-9637",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validation of an implicit instrument to assess God representations. Part 2: Associations between implicit and explicit measures of God representations and object-relational functioning

AU - Stulp, Henk P.

AU - Glas, Gerrit G.

AU - Eurelings-Bontekoe, Liesbeth

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Results about associations between God representations and well-being/mental health can be questioned because they are predominantly based on studies with self-report instruments. There are no well-validated implicit measures of God representations. Therefore we developed the Apperception Test for God Representations (ATGR). In a clinical (n = 75) and a nonclinical (n = 71) sample, we found patterns of associations of scales of the ATGR and of an explicit God representation measure with implicit and explicit measures of object-relational functioning that undergirded the validity of most ATGR scales. Differences in patterns of associations between patients and nonpatients could theoretically be explained by the concept mentalization.

AB - Results about associations between God representations and well-being/mental health can be questioned because they are predominantly based on studies with self-report instruments. There are no well-validated implicit measures of God representations. Therefore we developed the Apperception Test for God Representations (ATGR). In a clinical (n = 75) and a nonclinical (n = 71) sample, we found patterns of associations of scales of the ATGR and of an explicit God representation measure with implicit and explicit measures of object-relational functioning that undergirded the validity of most ATGR scales. Differences in patterns of associations between patients and nonpatients could theoretically be explained by the concept mentalization.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85061051609&origin=inward

U2 - 10.1080/19349637.2019.1569490

DO - 10.1080/19349637.2019.1569490

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Spirituality in Mental Health

JF - Journal of Spirituality in Mental Health

SN - 1934-9637

ER -