What European gynaecologists need to master: Consensus on medical expertise outcomes of pan-European postgraduate training in obstetrics & gynaecology

Jessica E. van der Aa, Annalisa Tancredi, Angelique J. Goverde, Petr Velebil, Jaroslav Feyereisl, Chiara Benedetto, Pim W. Teunissen, Fedde Scheele

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Objective European harmonisation of training standards in postgraduate medical education in Obstetrics and Gynaecology is needed because of the increasing mobility of medical specialists. Harmonisation of training will provide quality assurance of training and promote high quality care throughout Europe. Pan-European training standards should describe medical expertise outcomes that are required from the European gynaecologist. This paper reports on consensus development on the medical expertise outcomes of pan-European training in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Study design A Delphi procedure was performed amongst European gynaecologists and trainees in Obstetrics & Gynaecology, to develop consensus on outcomes of training. The consensus procedure consisted of two questionnaire rounds, followed by a consensus meeting. To ensure reasonability and feasibility for implementation of the training standards in Europe, implications of the outcomes were considered in a working group thereafter. We invited 142 gynaecologists and trainees in Obstetrics & Gynaecology for participation representing a wide range of European countries. They were selected through the European Board & College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and the European Network of Trainees in Obstetrics & Gynaecology. Results Sixty people participated in round 1 and 2 of the consensus procedure, 38 (63.3%) of whom were gynaecologists and 22 (36.7%) were trainees in Obstetrics & Gynaecology. Twenty-eight European countries were represented in this response. Round 3 of the consensus procedure was performed in a consensus meeting with six experts. Implications of the training outcomes were discussed in a working group meeting, to ensure reasonability and feasibility of the material for implementation in Europe. The entire consensus procedure resulted in a core content of training standards of 188 outcomes, categorised in ten topics. Conclusion European consensus was developed regarding the medical expertise outcomes of pan-European training in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. The outcomes will be described in core trainings standards, aimed at harmonising training in Obstetrics and Gynaecology in Europe to promote high quality care.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)143-152
Number of pages10
JournalEuropean Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Volume216
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2017

Cite this

@article{25cc00041bd1445985e072bf823299ed,
title = "What European gynaecologists need to master: Consensus on medical expertise outcomes of pan-European postgraduate training in obstetrics & gynaecology",
abstract = "Objective European harmonisation of training standards in postgraduate medical education in Obstetrics and Gynaecology is needed because of the increasing mobility of medical specialists. Harmonisation of training will provide quality assurance of training and promote high quality care throughout Europe. Pan-European training standards should describe medical expertise outcomes that are required from the European gynaecologist. This paper reports on consensus development on the medical expertise outcomes of pan-European training in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Study design A Delphi procedure was performed amongst European gynaecologists and trainees in Obstetrics & Gynaecology, to develop consensus on outcomes of training. The consensus procedure consisted of two questionnaire rounds, followed by a consensus meeting. To ensure reasonability and feasibility for implementation of the training standards in Europe, implications of the outcomes were considered in a working group thereafter. We invited 142 gynaecologists and trainees in Obstetrics & Gynaecology for participation representing a wide range of European countries. They were selected through the European Board & College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and the European Network of Trainees in Obstetrics & Gynaecology. Results Sixty people participated in round 1 and 2 of the consensus procedure, 38 (63.3{\%}) of whom were gynaecologists and 22 (36.7{\%}) were trainees in Obstetrics & Gynaecology. Twenty-eight European countries were represented in this response. Round 3 of the consensus procedure was performed in a consensus meeting with six experts. Implications of the training outcomes were discussed in a working group meeting, to ensure reasonability and feasibility of the material for implementation in Europe. The entire consensus procedure resulted in a core content of training standards of 188 outcomes, categorised in ten topics. Conclusion European consensus was developed regarding the medical expertise outcomes of pan-European training in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. The outcomes will be described in core trainings standards, aimed at harmonising training in Obstetrics and Gynaecology in Europe to promote high quality care.",
keywords = "Europe, Harmonisation, Medical education, PGME, Postgraduate training",
author = "{van der Aa}, {Jessica E.} and Annalisa Tancredi and Goverde, {Angelique J.} and Petr Velebil and Jaroslav Feyereisl and Chiara Benedetto and Teunissen, {Pim W.} and Fedde Scheele",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.07.022",
language = "English",
volume = "216",
pages = "143--152",
journal = "European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology",
issn = "0301-2115",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

What European gynaecologists need to master : Consensus on medical expertise outcomes of pan-European postgraduate training in obstetrics & gynaecology. / van der Aa, Jessica E.; Tancredi, Annalisa; Goverde, Angelique J.; Velebil, Petr; Feyereisl, Jaroslav; Benedetto, Chiara; Teunissen, Pim W.; Scheele, Fedde.

In: European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Vol. 216, 01.09.2017, p. 143-152.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - What European gynaecologists need to master

T2 - Consensus on medical expertise outcomes of pan-European postgraduate training in obstetrics & gynaecology

AU - van der Aa, Jessica E.

AU - Tancredi, Annalisa

AU - Goverde, Angelique J.

AU - Velebil, Petr

AU - Feyereisl, Jaroslav

AU - Benedetto, Chiara

AU - Teunissen, Pim W.

AU - Scheele, Fedde

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - Objective European harmonisation of training standards in postgraduate medical education in Obstetrics and Gynaecology is needed because of the increasing mobility of medical specialists. Harmonisation of training will provide quality assurance of training and promote high quality care throughout Europe. Pan-European training standards should describe medical expertise outcomes that are required from the European gynaecologist. This paper reports on consensus development on the medical expertise outcomes of pan-European training in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Study design A Delphi procedure was performed amongst European gynaecologists and trainees in Obstetrics & Gynaecology, to develop consensus on outcomes of training. The consensus procedure consisted of two questionnaire rounds, followed by a consensus meeting. To ensure reasonability and feasibility for implementation of the training standards in Europe, implications of the outcomes were considered in a working group thereafter. We invited 142 gynaecologists and trainees in Obstetrics & Gynaecology for participation representing a wide range of European countries. They were selected through the European Board & College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and the European Network of Trainees in Obstetrics & Gynaecology. Results Sixty people participated in round 1 and 2 of the consensus procedure, 38 (63.3%) of whom were gynaecologists and 22 (36.7%) were trainees in Obstetrics & Gynaecology. Twenty-eight European countries were represented in this response. Round 3 of the consensus procedure was performed in a consensus meeting with six experts. Implications of the training outcomes were discussed in a working group meeting, to ensure reasonability and feasibility of the material for implementation in Europe. The entire consensus procedure resulted in a core content of training standards of 188 outcomes, categorised in ten topics. Conclusion European consensus was developed regarding the medical expertise outcomes of pan-European training in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. The outcomes will be described in core trainings standards, aimed at harmonising training in Obstetrics and Gynaecology in Europe to promote high quality care.

AB - Objective European harmonisation of training standards in postgraduate medical education in Obstetrics and Gynaecology is needed because of the increasing mobility of medical specialists. Harmonisation of training will provide quality assurance of training and promote high quality care throughout Europe. Pan-European training standards should describe medical expertise outcomes that are required from the European gynaecologist. This paper reports on consensus development on the medical expertise outcomes of pan-European training in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Study design A Delphi procedure was performed amongst European gynaecologists and trainees in Obstetrics & Gynaecology, to develop consensus on outcomes of training. The consensus procedure consisted of two questionnaire rounds, followed by a consensus meeting. To ensure reasonability and feasibility for implementation of the training standards in Europe, implications of the outcomes were considered in a working group thereafter. We invited 142 gynaecologists and trainees in Obstetrics & Gynaecology for participation representing a wide range of European countries. They were selected through the European Board & College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and the European Network of Trainees in Obstetrics & Gynaecology. Results Sixty people participated in round 1 and 2 of the consensus procedure, 38 (63.3%) of whom were gynaecologists and 22 (36.7%) were trainees in Obstetrics & Gynaecology. Twenty-eight European countries were represented in this response. Round 3 of the consensus procedure was performed in a consensus meeting with six experts. Implications of the training outcomes were discussed in a working group meeting, to ensure reasonability and feasibility of the material for implementation in Europe. The entire consensus procedure resulted in a core content of training standards of 188 outcomes, categorised in ten topics. Conclusion European consensus was developed regarding the medical expertise outcomes of pan-European training in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. The outcomes will be described in core trainings standards, aimed at harmonising training in Obstetrics and Gynaecology in Europe to promote high quality care.

KW - Europe

KW - Harmonisation

KW - Medical education

KW - PGME

KW - Postgraduate training

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026464533&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.07.022

DO - 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.07.022

M3 - Article

VL - 216

SP - 143

EP - 152

JO - European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

JF - European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

SN - 0301-2115

ER -