WHO diagnostic criteria as a validation tool for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus: A study in five European countries

Joan G.M. Deckers, François G. Schellevis, Douglas M. Fleming

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Objective: In 1999, the World Health Organization (WHO) published new diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus (DM). The cut-off value of the fasting plasma glucose concentration was lowered from 7.8 to 7.0 mmol/l. The WHO criteria were used to validate the diagnosis made by the general practitioner, and to compare the diagnostic validity of diabetes mellitus in different countries. Methods: We retrospectively analysed 2556 newly diagnosed diabetics. Incidence was calculated according to the 1999 WHO criteria. Data were collected in general practice networks in five European countries or regions (Belgium, England, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain). Results: According to the WHO criteria, 82% of the cases were valid diagnoses. Compared to the total group, in Spain, significantly more diagnoses were in agreement with the WHO criteria, whereas this number was significantly lower in England and Portugal. From the patients whose diagnosis was not in agreement with the WHO criteria, significantly more were women than men. Conclusion: By using the WHO diagnostic criteria, the international standard, as a validation tool, we show that the diagnoses of diabetes mellitus made in primary care are valid. Furthermore, we show that these diagnoses are comparable between countries. Therefore, information from general practice registration networks is a valuable and valid source for international comparisons.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)108-113
Number of pages6
JournalEuropean Journal of General Practice
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2006

Cite this

@article{85c82167c8fc44d4baabd821033d44b4,
title = "WHO diagnostic criteria as a validation tool for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus: A study in five European countries",
abstract = "Objective: In 1999, the World Health Organization (WHO) published new diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus (DM). The cut-off value of the fasting plasma glucose concentration was lowered from 7.8 to 7.0 mmol/l. The WHO criteria were used to validate the diagnosis made by the general practitioner, and to compare the diagnostic validity of diabetes mellitus in different countries. Methods: We retrospectively analysed 2556 newly diagnosed diabetics. Incidence was calculated according to the 1999 WHO criteria. Data were collected in general practice networks in five European countries or regions (Belgium, England, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain). Results: According to the WHO criteria, 82{\%} of the cases were valid diagnoses. Compared to the total group, in Spain, significantly more diagnoses were in agreement with the WHO criteria, whereas this number was significantly lower in England and Portugal. From the patients whose diagnosis was not in agreement with the WHO criteria, significantly more were women than men. Conclusion: By using the WHO diagnostic criteria, the international standard, as a validation tool, we show that the diagnoses of diabetes mellitus made in primary care are valid. Furthermore, we show that these diagnoses are comparable between countries. Therefore, information from general practice registration networks is a valuable and valid source for international comparisons.",
keywords = "Diabetes mellitus, Diagnosis, Europe, General practice",
author = "Deckers, {Joan G.M.} and Schellevis, {Fran{\cc}ois G.} and Fleming, {Douglas M.}",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/13814780600881268",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "108--113",
journal = "The European Journal of General Practice",
issn = "1381-4788",
number = "3",

}

WHO diagnostic criteria as a validation tool for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus : A study in five European countries. / Deckers, Joan G.M.; Schellevis, François G.; Fleming, Douglas M.

In: European Journal of General Practice, Vol. 12, No. 3, 01.11.2006, p. 108-113.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - WHO diagnostic criteria as a validation tool for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus

T2 - A study in five European countries

AU - Deckers, Joan G.M.

AU - Schellevis, François G.

AU - Fleming, Douglas M.

PY - 2006/11/1

Y1 - 2006/11/1

N2 - Objective: In 1999, the World Health Organization (WHO) published new diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus (DM). The cut-off value of the fasting plasma glucose concentration was lowered from 7.8 to 7.0 mmol/l. The WHO criteria were used to validate the diagnosis made by the general practitioner, and to compare the diagnostic validity of diabetes mellitus in different countries. Methods: We retrospectively analysed 2556 newly diagnosed diabetics. Incidence was calculated according to the 1999 WHO criteria. Data were collected in general practice networks in five European countries or regions (Belgium, England, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain). Results: According to the WHO criteria, 82% of the cases were valid diagnoses. Compared to the total group, in Spain, significantly more diagnoses were in agreement with the WHO criteria, whereas this number was significantly lower in England and Portugal. From the patients whose diagnosis was not in agreement with the WHO criteria, significantly more were women than men. Conclusion: By using the WHO diagnostic criteria, the international standard, as a validation tool, we show that the diagnoses of diabetes mellitus made in primary care are valid. Furthermore, we show that these diagnoses are comparable between countries. Therefore, information from general practice registration networks is a valuable and valid source for international comparisons.

AB - Objective: In 1999, the World Health Organization (WHO) published new diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus (DM). The cut-off value of the fasting plasma glucose concentration was lowered from 7.8 to 7.0 mmol/l. The WHO criteria were used to validate the diagnosis made by the general practitioner, and to compare the diagnostic validity of diabetes mellitus in different countries. Methods: We retrospectively analysed 2556 newly diagnosed diabetics. Incidence was calculated according to the 1999 WHO criteria. Data were collected in general practice networks in five European countries or regions (Belgium, England, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain). Results: According to the WHO criteria, 82% of the cases were valid diagnoses. Compared to the total group, in Spain, significantly more diagnoses were in agreement with the WHO criteria, whereas this number was significantly lower in England and Portugal. From the patients whose diagnosis was not in agreement with the WHO criteria, significantly more were women than men. Conclusion: By using the WHO diagnostic criteria, the international standard, as a validation tool, we show that the diagnoses of diabetes mellitus made in primary care are valid. Furthermore, we show that these diagnoses are comparable between countries. Therefore, information from general practice registration networks is a valuable and valid source for international comparisons.

KW - Diabetes mellitus

KW - Diagnosis

KW - Europe

KW - General practice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750445617&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13814780600881268

DO - 10.1080/13814780600881268

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 108

EP - 113

JO - The European Journal of General Practice

JF - The European Journal of General Practice

SN - 1381-4788

IS - 3

ER -